mobile customer satisfaction questionnaire

By admin  


Customer profile and behavior analysis

CLIENT Profile behavior analysis

A STUDY IN ALL THE DAYS OF SPENCER

 

* K. Logeshwari

** V. Ramadevi

ABSTRACT

India is being seen as a potential goldmine for retail investors from all over the world and recent studies have evaluated India as the top destination for retailers an attractive emerging market retail. vast middle class of India and its retail industry almost untapped are the main attractions for global retail giants wanting to enter new markets. Although India has more than 5 million outlets, the country sorely lacks anything that might resemble an industry of retail in the modern sense. This scenario has led to a transition from retail sales unorganized organized retail. There is strong competition among organized retailers to attract customers. The study reveals that the top five factors that are expected by consumers are price, quality, shelf arrangements, the choice of brand and product availability. The choice variables of the mark, availability, discounts, packaging facilities and meet customer satisfaction levels of consumers daily Spencer. The results enable marketing strategists to develop appropriate strategies to increase the daily quota of Spencer in the industry of retail.

 

 

 

 

 

 

——————————————–

* Professor, Department of Management Studies and Research, Karpagam University, Coimbatore – 641021, Tamil Nadu

* * Professor, Department of Management Studies and Research, Karpagam University, Coimbatore – 641021, Tamil Nadu

 

 

INTRODUCTION

India Retail Industry is the largest among all industries, representing more than 10 percent of GDP and about 8 percent of employment. The retail industry in India has emerged as one of the industries most dynamic and fast-paced with several players in the market. But they have all tasted success, due to heavy initial investments required to reach equilibrium with its way to becoming the next booming industry. In this context, the study was conducted to determine the profile and buying behavior of consumers daily from Spencer.

Furthermore, the study seeks to identify the influence of demographic variables on the level of expectation and satisfaction and also highlights the gap between expectation and level satisfaction. It also analyzes the key factors that influence purchases and aims to understand the level of expectation and satisfaction The study assumes the characteristic descriptive research. One hundred twenty-five clients shows in the city of Coimbatore is selected based on convenience and data were collected through specially questionnaire.

The whole concept and idea of buying has been drawing attention in terms of format change and consumer behavior purchase, ushering in a revolution in shopping in India. modern retailing has entered the retail market in India as seen in the form of shopping centers bustling commercial centers and the huge multi-storey commercial complexes that offer entertainment and food all under one roof.

A large young working population with median age of 24 years, nuclear families in urban areas, along with rising population and opportunities for women emerging in the services sector will be key factors in the growth of organized sector in India.

In India, the vast middle class and industry the almost untapped retail forces are main attractions for global retail giants wanting to enter new markets, which in turn will help India Industry Retail to grow faster. Indian retail is expected to grow 25 percent annually. Modern retail in India will be worth U.S. $ 175-200 billion in 2016. The Retail Industry of India dominates the shopping cart. Mobile Phone Retail Industry in India is already a U.S. 16.7 billion U.S. dollars business, growing more than 20 percent per year. The future of Indian Industry Retail is a promising growth market, government policy increasingly favorable and emerging technologies to facilitate operations.

The study is primarily concerned with customer perception towards daily Spencer is a store retail. Retail is one of the important factors in the purchase and sale of products. Different types of point of sale through the store may be related very intimate with transactions in a face-to-face, the first name. At the other end of the scale, the property may be sold at retail worldwide, without physical contact being made at all. The different types of retail stores are as follows,

  • Department store
  • Retail door to door
  • Distance retail
  • Chain retail
  • Retail Party
  • Only independent shop non-franchise
  • Super Market
  • Retail Van
  • Ware clubhouse

Until the introduction of supermarkets, customers buying the products simply asking the shopkeeper for their products. There was a personal one to one between the customer and the store first keeper.The convenience store started in 1915 by Albert Gerard in Los Angeles. In these grocery stores were stacked on shelves that allows customers to walk and explore, collect their needs for themselves and the store manager only has to calculate the final bill at the end of the process and receive payment.

This new type of purchase was more efficient and many customers preferred. There has been a steady increase in the global number of convenience stores since the beginning. Despite that India has well over 5 million retail establishments of all sizes and styles, the country sorely lacks anything that might resemble an industry Retail sales in the modern sense. This presents international retail specialist with great opportunity. Retail in India is well-organized. No supply chain management perspective.

According to a survey by AT Kearney, an overwhelming proportion of Rs.400000 crore market retailers are not organized. In fact, only a segment of Rs.20000 crore market is organized. A little more than 8 percent of the Indian population sells retail. The first challenge facing the organized retail sector in India is the competence of the sector. traditional retail has been set India for centuries. It is a structure of low operating costs mostly own and runs it for generations.

By contrast, industry players have organized large expenses to meet and yet have to keep prices low enough to compete with the traditional sector. High cost to the organized sector arises from higher labor costs, social security to workers and high-quality and other accommodation facilities.

These drawbacks opportunity to present International and / or professionally managed Indian corporations to pioneer a modern distribution industry in India and benefit from it.

Problem Statement:

Indian retail sector is experiencing a transition from buoyant disorganized to retail organized. This has led to fierce competition between the organized retail sector. Understanding customers in terms of their profile, buying behavior, expectations and satisfaction is important. This is identified as the problem area and study has attempted to address the above said issues regarding the daily Spencer.

 

Objectives:

n To understand the profile and buying behavior of consumers daily Spencer.

n order to analyze the key factors affecting the daily shopping in Spencer.

n To understand the level of expectations and satisfaction of consumers daily Spencer.

n order to study the influence of demographic variables on the expectations and satisfaction.

n Analyze the gap between the level of expectation and satisfaction

Scope of study:

          This research gives a broad framework of clients per day of Spencer and an analysis of its profile and buying behavior. This can be used to guide future business plans and changes in current activities. It gives an idea of the areas that need emphasis and development.

This study was conducted in Coimbatore city, covering all areas falling within the area of Coimbatore, with a sample size of 125 respondents. All kinds of customers are met and their views were discussed.

 

Methodology:

a) Type of study:

The type of study is of a descriptive because it describes the perception of the client in every day from Spencer.

b) Sampling Design:

The sampling design consists of a sampling method and sample size. The sampling method used is the appropriate method of sampling because the population is infinite. The size sample is 125 respondents from customers every day of Spencer in the city of Coimbatore.

c) Method of Collection Data:

The method used to collect primary data is through questionnaires. Secondary data are collected through the company manuals, disks, magazines and websites.

d) Tools for analysis:

The statistical tools for analysis

  • Percentage analysis
  • Chi – square
  • The average score analysis
  • paired samples t "test

Percentage analysis:

Percentage of analysis is used to describe the profile of respondents and the buying behavior of customers Spencer Daily.

Chi-square analysis:

Chi – square is used when two variables are to be compared. In this study, the chi-square analysis was used for comparison between the level of expectation and satisfaction of customers every day of Spencer.

The average score analysis:

In this study the average value is used to identify and classify the factors influencing the level of trust and consumer satisfaction.

linked sample't "Test:

This test is used to determine the significant difference between the two variables. In this study, t-test is performed to find the difference between the level of expectation and satisfaction.

 

 

 

 

 

The average score analysis at the level of expectations and satisfaction of respondents in a number of factors

Level of Confidence '

Table 1 – The classification of factors Wait

Factors

Percentage

MEANSCORE

 

 

SCORE

RANGES

VI

I

N

LI

NI

Price

44

81

0

0

0

1.26

1

Quality

54

71

0

0

0

1.52

2

Location

29

74

22

0

0

1.944

13

Brand Image

41

72

12

0

0

1.768

9

Brand choice

54

70

0

1

0

1.584

4

Availability

49

76

0

0

0

1.608

5

Shelf Agreements

55

70

0

0

0

1.56

3

Crowd management

51

68

5

1

0

1.648

6

Assistance

26

71

28

0

0

2.016

14

Customer Service

54

41

28

2

0

1.824

11

Environment

41

71

8

0

0

1.696

7

Discounts

60

40

25

0

0

1.72

8

Billing

49

39

36

1

0

1.912

12

Packing facilities

50

48

27

0

0

1.816

10

Parking

36

59

22

44

0

2.048

15

VI – very very important, I – Important, N – neutral, LI – Less important

NI – Not important

In the above table, we can infer that the price factor is considered very important by respondents, factors such as the following order is quality, conservation agreements, the same selection, availability, crowd control, the environment, discounts, brand image, packaging facilities, customer service, billing, position to facilitate attendance and parking.

Level of satisfaction

Table 2 – Classification of the factors of satisfaction

Factors

Percentage

MEANSCORE

 

 

SCORE

RANGES

SLB

S

N

D

VDS

Price

11

78

35

1

0

1.26

1

Quality

24

64

36

1

0

1.52

2

Location

25

59

32

9

0

1.944

13

Brand Image

29

62

29

5

0

1.768

9

Brand choice

51

70

4

0

0

1.584

4

Availability

54

55

16

0

0

1.608

5

Shelf Agreements

32

71

22

0

0

1.56

3

Crowd management

28

77

19

1

0

1.648

6

Assistance

43

46

36

0

0

2.016

14

Customer Service

45

54

26

0

0

1.824

11

Environment

28

58

38

1

0

1.696

7

Discounts

57

48

20

0

0

1.72

8

Billing

28

63

33

1

0

1.912

12

Packing facilities

51

52

22

0

0

1.816

10

Parking

7

16

30

39

33

2.048

15

VMS-Very satisfied, S-Met, N-Neutral D-Dissatisfied, VDS "Very satisfied.

In the above table, we can infer that brand choice is the factor that is very pleased by the respondents, factors such as the following order is the availability, discounts, packaging facilities, care customer, arrangements, assistance, crowd control, branding, billing, environment, quality, location, price and parking.

Analysis of gaps between the level of expectations and satisfaction

To study linked the gap between expectations and satisfaction of t-test sample is used. To this end the following hypothesis is formulated.

Ho: There is no big difference between expectation and satisfaction with the various factors.

The above hypothesis is subjected to peer sample t-test and the results are summarized below.

Table 3 - Analysis Gap: Expectations vs. Satisfaction

Factors

T Value

P value

Meaning

Price

15.561

000

S

Quality

7.761

000

S

Location

2.988

003

S

Brand image

3.345

001

S

Brand choice

649

517

NS

Availability

1.210

229

NS

Shelf Agreements

5.182

000

S

Crowd management

3.927

000

S

Assistance

797

427

S

Customer Service

248

804

NS

Environment

5.136

000

S

Discounts

171

865

NS

Billing

1.518

131

S

Packing facilities

492

624

NS

Parking

11.654

000

S

S-significant, NS-Not significant;

The above table can be seen that there are significant differences between the level of expectations and satisfaction with respect to price, quality, location, image brand

Platform arrangements, crowd control, assistance, environment, billing and parking.

Can also be seen there is no gap between brand choices, availability,

Customer service, discounts and packaging facilities.

Graphic 1 – Expectation vs Satisfaction

Influence of demographic variables in expectation.

To understand the influence of demographic variables on the level of expectation, the chi-square test was performed on 5% significant level. Demographic variables selected are age, gender, education, occupation and income results are presented below.

H0: Age not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 4 – Influence of age on the confidence factors

Factors

SSS

Age

 

X 2

P Value

Price

354

950

Quality

2.594

458

Location

3.313

769

Brand Image

3.851

697

Brand choice

4.088

665

Availability

5.243

155

Shelf agreements

1.167

761

Crowd Management

7.774

557

Assistance

10.236

115

Customer Service

9.933

356

Environment

15.370

018

Discounts

2.764

838

Billing

8.352

499

Packing facilities

13.306

038

Parking facilities

8.352

582

From Table above can be noted that the demographic variable age has no significant influence on the expected factors.

H0: Gender has no influence significant at the level of expectation. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 5 – Influence of gender the confidence factors

Factors

Gender

 

X 2

P Value

Price

226.402

000

Quality

225.332

000

Location

225.971

000

Brand image

226.107

000

Brand choice

224.047

000

Availability

223.241

000

Shelf Agreements

225.614

000

Crowd management

225.237

000

Assistance

223.940

000

Customer Service

232.762

000

Environment

224.208

000

Discounts

226.288

000

Billing

226.606

000

Packing facilities

229.536

000

Parking

224.512

000

From the table above we can see that the demographic variable gender has an influence factors significant in all expectation.

H0: Educational Qualification has no influence significant at the level of expectation. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 6 – Influence of qualifying Educational expectations on factors

Factors

Educational Qualification

 

X 2

P Value

Price

40.328

000

Quality

0.200

655

Location

38.224

000

Brand Image

43.216

000

Brand choice

62.608

000

Availability

5.832

016

Shelf Agreements

1.800

180

Crowd administration

107.032

000

Assistance

31.024

000

Customer Service

47.320

000

Environment

48.304

000

Discounts

14.800

. 000

Billing

42.008

020

Packing facilities

7.792

000

Parking

86.720

000

From the table above shows that the demographic variable educational qualification has a significant influence on the price expectations of factors, location, brand image, brand choice, crowd control, assistance and customer service, and the environment, discounts, packaging facilities and parking.

H0: The occupation has a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 7 – Influence of the occupation in expectation factors

Factors

Occupation

 

X 2

Value P

Price

223.911

000

Quality

237.582

000

Location

232.485

000

Brand Image

237.168

000

Brand choice

229.844

000

Availability

232.374

000

Shelf Agreements

233.561

000

Crowd management

242.965

000

Assistance

254.669

000

Customer Service

237.965

000

Environment

250.236

000

Discounts

242.312

. 000

Billing

233.348

000

Packing facilities

242.245

000

Parking

242.148

000

From the table above we can see that the occupation demographic variable has a significant influence on all factors of expectation.

H0: Income does not have a significant influence on the level of expectation. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 8 – Influence of the monthly rent on the expectation of factors

Factors

Monthly Income

 

X 2

P Value

Price

2.619

454

Quality

4.042

257

Location

8.797

185

Brand Image

2.651

851

Brand choice

1.745

942

Availability

1.290

732

Shelf Agreements

1.651

648

Crowd management

22.573

007

Assistance

5.786

448

Customer Service

6.488

690

Environment

2.428

876

Discounts

5.806

445

Turnover

8.839

452

Packing facilities

6.228

398

Parking

17.873

120

From the table above we can see that the monthly income does not influence the demographic variable significant in all expectation factors.

 

 

 

 

 

Influence of demographic variables on factors satisfaction.

To understand the influence of demographic variables on the level of satisfaction, the chi-square test was performed on 5% significant level of selected demographic variables age, sex, education, occupation and income results are presented below.

H0: Age has a significant influence on the level of satisfaction. This hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 9 – Influence of age on satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Age

 

X 2

P Value

Price

4.745

0.856

Quality

3.778

0.925

Location

7.208

0.615

Brand Image

8.985

0.439

Brand choice

8.096

0.231

Availability

13.220

0.040

Shelf Agreements

5.474

0.485

Crowd management

7.428

0.593

Assistance

9.654

0.140

Attention Customer

2.935

0.817

Environment

6.799

0.658

Discounts

4.960

0.549

Billing

7.004

0.637

Packing facilities

4.546

0.603

Parking

11.314

0.502

From the table above we can see that the demographic variable age has no significant influence on the level of satisfaction.

H0: Gender has no significant influence on the factors of satisfaction. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 10 – Influence of gender on satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Gender

 

X 2

P Value

Price

227.153

000

Quality

224.524

000

Location

226.014

000

Brand image

233.537

000

Brand choice

227.390

000

Availability

228.355

000

Shelf Agreements

223.513

000

Crowd management

229.262

000

Assistance

227.303

000

Customer Service

225.804

000

Environment

225.329

000

Discounts

223.741

. 000

Billing

222.393

000

Packing facilities

224.870

000

Parking

240.827

000

From the table above we can see that the demographic variable gender has a significant influence on all the factors of satisfaction.

H0: Educational background does not have a significant influence on the factors of satisfaction. The above hypothesis has been tested and results are presented below.

Table 11 – Influence of Education qualification in the satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Education qualification

 

X 2

P Value

Price

238.949

000

Quality

233.323

000

Location

232.164

000

Brand Image

248.992

000

Brand choice

224.988

000

Availability

236.773

000

Shelf Agreements

234.54

000

Crowd management

232.934

000

The assistance

233.699

000

Customer Service

240.444

000

Environment

239.449

000

Discounts

231.286

. 000

Billing

233.251

000

Packing facilities

229.861

000

Parking

236.500

000

From the table above shows that the classification of the variable Population education has an important influence on all factors of satisfaction.

H0: The occupation has a significant influence on the factors of satisfaction. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results are presented below.

Table 12 - Influence of occupation on satisfaction factors

Factors

sss

Occupation

 

X 2

Value P

Price

243.527

000

Quality

247.872

000

Location

237.861

000

Brand image

254.694

000

Brand choice

227.260

000

Availability

248.990

000

Shelf Agreements

234.207

000

Crowd management

243.625

000

Assistance

232.494

000

Customer Service

238.576

000

Environment

244.765

000

Discounts

230.430

. 000

Billing

241.540

000

Packing facilities

234.957

000

Parking

248.510

000

From the table above we can see that the occupation demographic variable has a significant influence on all the factors of satisfaction.

H0: Monthly income does not have a significant influence on the factors of satisfaction. The above hypothesis has been tested and the results presented are below.

Table 13 – Influence of the monthly meeting on the factors

Factors

sss

Monthly Income

 

X 2

P Value

Price

27.867

001

Quality

7.798

555

Location

4.999

834

Brand Image

8.387

496

Brand choice

10.054

122

Availability

2.505

868

Shelf Agreements

1.845

933

Crowd management

9.253

414

Assistance

6.443

375

Customer Service

7.987

239

Environment

6.093

731

Discounts

5.209

517

Billing

7.673

567

Packing facilities

1.768

940

Parking

4.835

963

From the table above we can see that the monthly income of the demographic variable has a significant influence on the level of satisfaction with price. In all other hypothesis is rejected.

CONCLUSION

Profile of respondents

  • The majority of respondents belong to age group 31 to 40 (ie 44%), 27.2% of respondents are between age group 20-30,23.2% of respondents belong to age group over 40, and 5.6% of respondents belong to the category of younger than 20.
  • The majority (63.2%) of respondents were women and 36.8% are men.
  • The majority (30.4%) of respondents are home makers.27.2% of respondents are employed, 22.4% of respondents belong to the professional category, the percentage of business people is 13.6% and 6.4% students
  • Majorities (56.8%) of respondents are graduates, 32.8% are postgraduates, and 8.8% of respondents are people with secondary level education.
  • Most (45.6%) of respondents have an income level between Rs.10001-20000, 42.4% of respondents had income between Rs.20001-30000, 4% of respondents have a level income above Rs.30000 and 1.6% of the respondents have an income level below 10000.

Consumer Buying Behavior

  • The majority (69.6%) of respondents have come to know through friends and family of Spencer, 16% through advertisements, and 13.6% through magazines and newspapers.
  • The majority (47.2%) of respondents visit the store between 15 and 30 days, 35.2% of respondents between 31 to 45 days, 9.6% over 45 days and 8%, once in 15 days.
  • Most respondents (47.2%) spend between Rs.1001 – 3000 35.2% of respondents spend between Rs.3001 – 4000, 9.6% of respondents spend over Rs.4000 and 8% of respondents spend less than 1000.
  • Most (45.6%) of the respondents feel that the departmental store Kannan closely follows Spencer, 32% of them feel Nilgiris as the nearest competitor and 20% of them feel great bazaar at the close competitor.
  • The majority (45.6%) of respondents considered that the department store Kannan closely follows Spencer, 32% Nilgiris them feel like the closest competitor and 20% of them feel great bazaar as the nearest competitor.

Level of confidence and satisfaction

  • The price factor is considered very important by the interviewees, the following factors as the order is quality, conservation agreements, selection of them, availability, crowd control, the environment, discounts, brand image, packaging facilities, customer service, billing, position facilitate attendance and parking.
  • brand choice is the factor that is very pleased by the respondents, followed by availability, discounts, facilities packaging, customer service, arrangements for assistance, crowd control, branding, billing, environment, quality, location, price and parking.

Satisfaction Level vs. Expectations Gap Analysis

  • There is difference between the level of expectations and satisfaction with respect to price, quality, location, brand image, the provisions of the shelf, crowd control, assistance, and environment, billing and parking.

It can also be seen that there is no difference between the options of brand

availability, willingness customer and packing facilities.

Influence of demographic variables on the level of expectations

  • The variables sex, educational background and occupation have a significant influence on the level of expectations and the variables age and monthly income has no influence on the level of expectation.

 

Influence of variables population in the level of satisfaction

  • The variables sex, educational background, occupation have a significant influence on the level of satisfaction and the variables age and monthly income does not influence the level of satisfaction.

Recommendations

The recommendations given to the organization are still

  • From consumer profile, it is clear that the majority of respondents belong to 31-40 and earn an income of 10001-20000; daily Spencer can develop new marketing strategies to focus on other age group and income groups of people.
  • The results show that products of the majority of respondents grocery shopping, and others need to be properly positioned to attract more consumers.
  • Important factors highlighted by the customers are price, quality, conservation agreements, selection of them, availability, crowd control, the environment, discounts, brand image, packaging facilities, customer service, billing, location, and parking assistance, these aspects should take priority in formulating the strategy.
  • Satisfaction factors, such as parking, price, location, etc. are less satisfied or neutral by consumers, care must be taken in the improvement of the factors to retaining customers.
  • It should make efforts to reduce the gap between expectations and satisfaction in the event of such factors as price, quality and location, etc. This brand image will

to halt the loss customers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

The retail market in India is very competitive due to the increase in the number of consumers belonging to middle class and higher income, the change in consumption patterns and the opening economy due to liberalization, privatization and globalization. In this context, the study attempts to analyze the profile and buying behavior of consumers and the factors that influence the level of expectations and level of consumer satisfaction. The results would enable the organization to develop appropriate strategies and improve market share.

 

Books referred:

 

 

  1. Kothari, CR (1990). "Research Methodology Methods and Techniques', Wishaw Publishers, second edition.
  1. Philip Kotler and Kevin Lane Keller (2006). "Marketing Management", Prentice Hall of India Pvt Ltd, twelfth edition
  1. Stephen Robbins (1996). "The behaviors of organization" Prentice Hall de Mexico SA de CV, Third Edition
  1. Dr. DD Sharma (2005). "Market Research", Sultan Chand & Sons, Third edition

Pages web concerns:

 

www.google.com

web.ebscohost.com

www.spencersretail.com

www.fibre2fashion.com

www.rpgretail.com

www.retailing.com

www.market.com

About the Author



Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*